# promethee method ppt

/Length 15 0 R Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. /CropBox [0 0 595.2199707031 842] 5 0 obj <<

!\$�\$�*�x�/c+'ܢ7�����j���ѩ�b�v8�3U�q�&�����]�32_\$��˸o޺^*�#��q���N�7Q. 4 0 obj /Pages 2 0 R << /CropBox [0 0 595.2199707031 842] x��\���uf���S�����; 4 �qY�HkeQTĕ|�T.�f�,00�\=B~:���.

hެ�Mo�0��Jn�8�=����HU�B���¢v�ʿ'o6;� Zz˻�؏{�L��C�\$1�U"�|ՆX�ME �� �)��r���������ew=�4�='��Wۯ϶7gaJ���fy�ys~�{����t9^�D�� ��!=x�y;^\�������4�Pu�d��~��8^Os��ٽ~�;ߍ�|�Մ3�9����"S�4�ly7��-&F����-*c�F�X�1��A �A �� JȘ JȘ ��1e�2f�2f�2f�"c6*�S*��T"c1�D�bPi~֠�A%2�Jd,��X*��8ը8�T&�T&�T&�T&�T��2�LF5�LF5�LF5�LF8aT U��*d�A2  Promethee I. /MediaBox [0 0 595.2199707031 842] /Contents 12 0 R In this paper, we are interested in multi-criteria ranking problems in the existing method PROMETHEE(Preference Ranking Organization Method … b\$Xy@bQ*P� ���!�-͌����c�� ��q�c5�������ư�1,I0�1�"�.#- t�\

%PDF-1.6 %���� the Fuzzy PROMETHEE method.

h��S�N�@����w�/�ʁ@���HH�C��J�T����NZD��zᔱ=q':Ҡ!���8� 8�����d�� �3����2H��"��� ��\$�}I8��4q�'�D����!hX��f?�͐��R���W�Eq����}z���z�֊��k�+�ߛ���]���d��T5�J�

This method is described below. endobj <<

/MediaBox [0 0 595.2199707031 842] /Thumb 7 0 R Underground mining, Underground mining methods. /Parent 2 0 R /Rotate 0 /Thumb 10 0 R /CropBox [0 0 595.2199707031 842] /Kids [3 0 R 4 0 R 5 0 R] /Thumb 13 0 R Qualities: clear method with simple conception and possibilities to check the stability of the results (Brans et al, 1986). In recent decades, several Multi-Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) methods have been proposed to help in selecting the best compromise alternatives. 407 THE USE OF PROMETHEE METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE STRATEGIC POTENTIAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES Romualdas Ginevi 1ius , Valentinas Podvezko2, Miloslav Novotny3 1 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saul tekio ave. 11, LT–10223 Vilnius, Lithuania E-mail: romualdas.ginevicius@vgtu.lt 2 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saul tekio ave. 11, LT–10223 … The last area covers the papers published in several fields: Medicine, Agriculture, Education, Design, Government and Sports. /Parent 2 0 R /Version /1.4 Compleate ranking .

endobj PROMETHEE Ι deals with a partial preorder, PROMETHEE II deals with a complete

/MediaBox [0 0 595.2199707031 842] PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enriching Evaluations) was firstly developed by Brans in 1982 at the conference [4], and then further developed as a family [5]. /Resources 14 0 R /Type /Page 6 0 obj /Type /Page /Contents 9 0 R In the meantime, the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) family of outranking methods and their applications has attracted much attention from academics and practitioners. >> Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Hassan Z. Harraz hharraz2006@yahoo.com 2010- 2011 This material is intended for use in lectures, presentations and as handouts to students, and is provided in Power point format so as to allow customization for the individual needs of course instructors. /Resources 8 0 R A few years later, several versions of the PROMETHEE methods such as the PROMETHEE III for ranking based on interval, the PROMETHEE IV for complete or partial ranking of the alternatives when the set of viable solutions is continuous, the PROMETHEE V for problems with segmentation constraints (Brans and Mareschal, 1992), the PROMETHEE VI for the human brain representation (Brans and … PROMETHEE Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations 1 PROMETHEE & GAIA methods endstream endobj 19592 0 obj <>stream

2 0 obj /StructParents 89

The application areas include the papers on the topics of Environment Management, Hydrology and Water Management, Business and Financial Management, Chemistry, Logistics and Transportation, Manufacturing and Assembly, Energy Management, Social, and Other Topics.

endstream endobj 19593 0 obj <>stream Partial ranking.

h�2R0P�044U0�T�0҆� ����9�cfin�`dj�`c��_�W�`�R �1P���,H�HLO-��CW6� 19591 0 obj <>stream

<< >> /Count 3

PROMETHEE methodThe Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations.

View 7.ISE527 PROMETHEE.ppt from ISE 527 at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals. stream

endobj /Contents 6 0 R /Type /Pages << /Parent 2 0 R This means that scores of the alternatives are calculated per …

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021. endobj

/Type /Page In recent decades, several Multi-Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) methods have been proposed to help in selecting the best compromise alternatives. As all outranking methods, PROMETHEE method, which is the method that is developed and used through the project, proceeds to a pairwise comparison of alternatives in each single criterion in order to determine partial binary relations denoting the strength of preference of an alternative a over alternative b. endobj In the meantime, the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) family of outranking methods and their applications has attracted much attention from academics and practitioners. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. It is a pairwise comparisons method, also known as an outranking method. PROMETHEE The PROMETHEE method was developed at the Service de Mathématique de Gestion of the Université Libre de Belgique. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies. 3 0 obj >> The scholarly papers are also classified by (1) year of publication, (2) journal of publication, (3) authors’ nationality, (4) PROMETHEE as applied with other MCDA methods, and (5) PROMETHEE as applied with GAIA (Geometrical Analysis for Interactive Aid) plane. It is hoped that the paper can meet the needs of researchers and practitioners for easy references of PROMETHEE methodologies and applications, and hence promote the future of PROMETHEE research.

ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. %���� >> aP��0�2�lPU�X ���:�Q��jPJ�jPJ�jPJ�jPJ�jPJ�jPJ�jPʉ�A)�A)�C����_��A��͠@�fP c3(��Դ�-���{��z����dL�if::�_m?�wg���6��������v�Zas���8�����Ѫ�ʲз��"��C-�����+S�RW����I��r��UW� ���a\$V9��3+�-�x:�٘:� �ޓ�[�e�߮�-����I�>�R�n�RS������?�T��5H�_꾠�y���Ӓ����-���N����\$E�ߖ��i��Nrxf�\$���8 "z'A��� ��I �wH�"��@R�\$��; ��N��I�E'�k��Qt�F�I�E'�k��Qt�F�I�E'�k��Q�����������\$p����5�N�(: \��\$p����5�Nרy��; \��\$p����5�N�(: \��\$p����5�N�(: \��\$p��HnQt�F�I�E'�k��Qt�F�yd��Qt�F�I�E'�ku����5�N�(: \��\$p����5�N�(�'����5��-��.Q���}һuR��G���uR��t�I麓�u'��NJם��;)]wR��t�I麓�U'��NJם��;)�J Sꎭz �����'��~���'����fK�` 1��� /StructParents 87

/Type /Catalog In this paper, a classification scheme and a comprehensive literature review are presented in order to uncover, classify, and interpret the current research on PROMETHEE methodologies and applications. Promethee II. /Rotate 0 >> %PDF-1.4 Promethee method. /Resources 11 0 R Lecture 4: Underground Mining 1. /Filter /FlateDecode /Rotate 0 << >> 1 0 obj

/StructParents 88

Based on the scheme, 217 scholarly papers from 100 journals are categorized into application areas and non-application papers. Abstract: Given a finite set of alternatives, the multi-criteria decision making problem consists in ranking each alternative from the best to the worst ones.